You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I've tried making the terminal a trusted application, doesn't help. And you can see from the picture that packets are going to all ports. It looks like server considers them as unnecessary network operation :)
Do you have Outpost by any chance? I have one that manages to prevent browsers from working when protection is suspended, specifically here on this forum...
I'd probably risk disabling it altogether and checking to see if it is or isn't.
PS I have outgoing from 1950 with working terminal and 43 bytes each.
Do you have Outpost by any chance? I have one that manages to prevent browsers from working when protection is suspended, specifically here on this forum...
I'd probably risk disabling it altogether to see if it is or not and check.
PS I've got outgoing 1950s with the terminal running at 43 bytes each.
SOMODO firewall, tried two modes, learning and safe. I think I tried to disable it yesterday too, but I can try it again to be sure.
I can't really tell you anything about COMODO, I recently killed an evening on it, decided it was too cumbersome for fine-tuning, so I went back to Outpost.
If it works without it, I can except to throw the Outpost rules here.
PS Learning in SOMODO, I remember, it's kind of illogical. There, to make it start asking if the program starts breaking into the net, the mode is called something else. And in safe mode it probably won't let you in.
I can't really tell you anything about COMODO, I recently killed an evening on it, decided it was too cumbersome for fine-tuning, so I went back to Outpost.
If it works without it, I can except to throw the Outpost rules here.
PS Learning in SOMODO, I remember, it's kind of illogical. There, to make it start asking if the program starts breaking into the net, the mode is called something else. And in safe mode it probably won't let you in.
Oops, decided to take a look at the tester, ran what it suggests when it starts (ExpertMACD) didn't change anything, just pressed the start button, and here's the result
Oops, decided to take a look at the tester, ran what it prompted on startup (ExpertMACD) without changing anything, just pressed the start button, and this is the result
Do you have NVIDIA Firewall on your system? (might have been installed with the drivers. If it is, tear it down).
And try to run terminal with /portable key (that's if 7 doesn't allow because of rights).
upgr just in case LspCleaner It's for removing Trojans, but seems to be used to remove nvlsp.dll library if the system won't let you kill it(Remove all LSPs).
Is there an NVIDIA Firewall on the system? (may have been installed with the drivers. If it is, tear it down).
And try running the terminal with the /portable switch (that's if 7 doesn't allow it because of permissions).
I've tried putting it on the D drive, still the same.
More and more often I think it might be worth waiting a few more years :)
I've tried it on the D drive, it's still the same.
I keep thinking it might be worth waiting a few more years :)
1. It makes no difference.
2, Mm. Depends on the level... I decided to wait a year ago too, now I regret it.
Upgr I'm out. I'll come back tomorrow.
Put the terminal on a netbook with XP and the same COMODO, everything works, including the tester test described above.
Conclusion: MT5 has problems with Win7.
The /portable key doesn't help, launching with admin rights doesn't help, installing to another drive doesn't help.
Put the terminal on a netbook with XP and the same COMODO, everything works, including the tester test described above.
Conclusion: MT5 has problems with Win7.
The /portable key doesn't help, launching with admin rights doesn't help, installing to another drive doesn't help.