Errors, bugs, questions - page 2592
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Found the highlighted constant SYMBOL_CHART_MODE_OLD in the editor.
Of course it is not in ENUM_SYMBOL_CHART_MODE.
What is it?
Prehistoric chart mode.
Hasn't been used for a long time
A prehistoric mode of chart formation.
Hasn't been used for a long time
Got it, thanks.
I've run into this problem:
condition
print
What the ...? How is this possible? Why does the condition hold?
P.S.
I've run into this problem:
condition
print
What the ...? How is this possible? Why does the condition hold?
P.S.
What about...
?
How about...
?
Holy crap!
It's so much easier to screw up on the simplest of things. )))))))))))
Thank you. (chuckles)
Holy crap!
It's so much easier to screw up on the simplest of things. )))))))))))
Thank you. (chuckles)
You're welcome. I've been caught like that myself - now I try to put all the terms in separate brackets.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/docs/basis/operations/rules
the sum has a higher priority than the comparison, i.e. it looks like a bug...
https://www.mql5.com/ru/docs/basis/operations/rules
the sum has a higher priority than the comparison,***
Yes, but rather than catching a black swan every time, it's better to write correctly and with a line-up at once.
of the same series:
condition? constant:X+Y
is more often interpreted as follows:
condition? constant:(X+Y)
but sometimes
(condition?constant:X)+Y
I have come across it in Quaternary a long time ago. The conclusion is the same as Vladimir's - I like parentheses.