Errors, bugs, questions - page 2246
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If there is a large orange volume and an all/nothing mode, why not?
because instead of better prices there are incomprehensible ones from the deep depths of the cup. the execution mode does not change anything.
because instead of better prices there are incomprehensible ones from the deepest depths of the cup. the execution mode does not change anything.
No, that's me being stupid. the prices are not from the depth of the cup, they are crossed.
But all the same, even in the visible market there is not enough volume, i.e. even if there is a FOK order, there is volume, it should be executed.
there should not be such a picture, even theoretically, imho.
Some kind of undocumented innovation
but otherwise.
it's fine. What's the difference?
The question was theoretical ... It is clear that in practice such a glass can not be ... Therefore, the answer is theoretical: Until the necessary volume is accumulated (and in the example the total volume to buy less than orange) - there will be no movement. For blue, there is also a theoretical answer (but I won't say anything).
Why theoretical? Taken from the MQ Demo (GAZP, 25 July). So if it's there, it may be on another server as well. You have to be able to process and interpret it. So the question is open.
Why theoretical? Taken from the MQ Demo (GAZP, 25 July). So if it's there, it may be on another server as well. You have to be able to process and interpret it. So the question is open.
Some undocumented innovation
otherwise
fine. What's the difference?
The difference is that an empty structure has size 0, as opposed to an empty class.
In mql5 class and structure are different entities
Got distracted for a year from my STLMQL implementation and now this miracle doesn't compile. There was this code (simplified to the minimum to reproduce error):
Now forward declaration doesn't compile - error undefined class 'IterableContainer' can't be used. I can't do without forward declarations there. Can't figure out how to fix it.
Took a year off from my STLMQL implementation and now this miracle doesn't compile.
Took a year off from my STLMQL implementation
I'd like to see a usability example.