You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
will not
There are at least 4 different results:
on my machine in preparation for Championship 2011: ~700.00
automatic test : -3834.32
now : -3514.45
or : -4681.85
The last 2 results were obtained on the same terminal instance (located on a removable disk) on different machines. The EA is multi-currency.
???
The last 2 results were obtained on the same instance of the terminal (located on a removable drive) on different machines. This Expert Advisor is multicurrency.
???
Are all testing conditions identical? Wasn't it the case that in one case you tested on EURUSD and in the other on GBPUSD?
It would be good if you wrote to servicedesk and provided an EA with all the details.
Everything is identical on the settings tab.
For some reason, when clicking on "reply" it doesn't quote (IE8).
there is such a lamer question.
When doing ArrayResize array of objects (pointers), CheckPointer does not return ==POINTER_INVALID and !=POINTER_DYNAMC.
That is, an array of pointers of the normal type.
is this a bug ?
it helps if all new elements=NULL, but new created pointers must return POINTER_INVALID at least
I think it's a bug. Pointers are initially blank... (although not explicitly set to NULL by ArrayResize)
If the array initially had size 100 and was filled with valid values, then it was reduced and again increased to 100, it's quite possible that the pointers remained valid.
...
For some reason it's not quoted when you click on "reply" (IE8).
Tried it - it works.
Can you provide a link to the comment you tried to quote.
Previously replied to https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/1111/page539#comment_104666
PS. In FireFox both reply and edit works...
In general, if you dig into the rather simple code of the fractal indicator, it is symmetrical about the middle (the fractal itself) as for High:
as well as for Low. And, at first glance, the areas highlighted by red rectangles should not seem to occur...Suspect >/>=.