1200 subscribers!!! - page 29
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Aleksey, cite our post/posts where we are trying to "dump" a rival. Maybe we made an error somewhere. Please, find such posts.
It is very funny to read your comments here, comrade! IMHO, it really is you who is choking on bile the most.
And most importantly, so many pounces on the provider of the signal under discussion)) While completely ignoring your own unsubstantiated and stupid statements.
But... go on, keep it up!)
I'll let you and others like you in on my little secret.
I'm attracted to intrigues and fights. I am interested in the precedent itself, in the reactions to it from different sides. I'm interested in people as such.
In this case--the signal under discussion--is that precedent, and the attention to it is what creates the intrigue and brawl that I'm interested in.
As I don't broadcast my trade, this signal is not a competitor to me and it doesn't affect my business in any way.
But my statements are being read. And this is what is important to me. Some people agree, some do not. Some find them sensible, some find them absurd. I respect every opinion.
and the maximum drawdown for these 1-1.5 months was less than 5%. it means that subscribers made more profit than the drawdown (remember 1.5 years ago subscribers were 2 times less)... that is, to call them "the crowd" who subscribe to the wrong - was wrong.
2. there was a statement that each deal has a slippage of 150 pips on average.
As far as I understand, there is double copying and trades are copied quite well. it means that subscribers with single copying are not worse.
3. Many people here are calling for justice... they talk about unfairness... but what should I call it?
I can also tell you about such a problem
Yesterday someone (introduced himself as a girl) in Skype began to ask about my trading ... the risks ...
If i understand correctly, then this person (introducing herself as a girl) started asking about my trading risks in skype.
If I understand correctly, this broker copies my strategy for his clients, bypassing MQL service (and therefore bypassing me).
If i understand correctly, then this broker copies my strategy to his clients via the MQL service (and therefore bypasses me).
I don't know how to solve it.
He also does not allow those who have 1000+ subscribers into the top, otherwise he misleads subscribers, which, by the way, includes a branch.
Let me tell you and others like you my little secret.
I am amused by intrigues and fights. I am interested in the precedent itself, in the reactions of the various parties to it. That is, I'm interested in people as such.
In this case--the signal in question--is that precedent, and paying attention to it just creates the kind of intrigue and brawl I'm interested in.
As I don't broadcast my trade, this signal is not a competitor to me and it doesn't affect my business in any way.
But my statements are being read. And this is what is important to me. Some people agree, some do not. Some find them sensible, some find them absurd. I respect any opinion.
2. There was a statement that each trade has a slippage of 150 pips on average.
There is no need to pretend that there was no discussion of this statement with the developers.
It means that subscribers who copy individually are doing the same.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and trading strategies testing
1200 subscribers!!!
fxsaber, 2017.01.19 11:38
It's easy to explain
Yuri, read not just one of my posts, but several posts in a row in a chain of communication with other participants.
OK.
Marat, but I just read it as an independent thought and I didn't like it.
Okay, then this thread, as I understand it, you support for the sake of intrigue and a fight?
Alexei! And a good healthy fight is really very interesting.
Take any movie - what kind of westerns will you watch if it doesn't have a good fight!
Okay, let's take your first post in this thread.
That's a valid point. And the more subscribers the more new ones will come and that's utopia. The flaw in the rating calculation. And further provider will simply trade with less and less profitability, just not to kill the previous results, but live at the expense of subscribers and this will continue as long as either the subscribers in the mass will leave him, or until the administration will not show action in changing the rating formation.
I have to say that the quality was not evaluated...
It means that the subscribers have made more profit than the drawdown (remember, 1.5 years ago subscribers were twice less)... it means it was wrong to call them a "crowd" which is subscribed to the wrong place.
2. there was a statement that each deal has a slippage of 150 pips on average.
As far as I understand, there is double copying and trades are copied quite well. it means that subscribers with single copying are not worse.
3. Many people here are calling for justice... they talk about unfairness... but what should I call it?
I can also tell you about a problem
Yesterday someone (introduced himself as a girl) in Skype began to ask about my trading ... the risks ...
The problem may also be that yesterday the person (who introduced herself as a girl in Skype) started asking questions about my trades and the risks.
If I understand correctly, this broker copies my strategy for his clients, bypassing MQL service (and therefore bypassing me).
If i understand correctly, then this broker copies my strategy to his clients via the MQL service (and therefore bypasses me).
I don't have any variants to solve it.
For information (I just don't want to purge the thread again).