Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2644
![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I have never seen grails here, but there are many vague hints about possessing the Great Mystery of the Grail) I have already commented on this topic and the term "fool" here is practically a medical term, not a swear word).
Let's get some research published, some ideas.
I am thinking about the possibility of combining my idea with the idea of the PRIM algorithm. I don't have much to brag about.
Let's publish some researches, ideas...
I am thinking about the possibility of combining my idea with the idea of PRIM algorithm. I don't have much to brag about.
There is already an article about clustering :) it is useless though
What is the freshness of Prim compared to others, I still don't understand
I found it suitable as a basis for an algorithm for selecting a working region in a set of predictors. Roughly speaking, I build initial approximations for cube regions based on my idea, and then try to adjust them more finely.
Well, optimising only for profit, which leads to trying to improve the system by artificially increasing false negatives.
There is no rigorous theory and it is hardly possible.
I found it suitable as a basis for an algorithm for selecting a working region in a set of predictors. Roughly speaking, based on my idea, I build initial approximations for cube regions and then try to adjust them more finely.
Well, I optimise only by profit, which leads to an attempt to improve the system by artificially increasing false negative cases.
There is no rigorous theory and it is unlikely to be possible.
I don't get it...
It may well be so. But it seems to be a more interpretable approach to comparison/selection of features and optimisation of metaparameters.
That may well be the case. But it seems to be a more interpretable approach to comparison/selection of features and optimisation of metaparameters.