Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1652
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
- as a matter of principle
- I didn't bother with it.
- in the tester does not work
... well, as if only a shaman's tambourine for the complete set is not enough, although ... probably all start so - the other would be boring)))
Okay, I do not distract from the contemplation of what fascinates
I do not understand the irony, what is wrong?
The point is that I emphasized the use of a strategy tester, but there are two opinions about the feasibility of testing:
- the tester lies
- things that work in the tester on the real account fail
But there is a third opinion - we should analyze why it happens, but usually nobody has enough diligence
The point is that I emphasized the use of a strategy tester, but there are two opinions about the feasibility of testing:
- the tester lies
- things that work in the tester on the real account fail
there is truth in the third opinion - it is necessary to examine why it happens, but usually nobody has enough diligence
1. the tester is an excellent tool and it does not lie. He is needed to test the profitability of the strategy, that is his job. If there is no strategy and no profitability, there is nothing to test.
2. We should overcome the lack of concentration of consciousness. It is high time to understand that "profitable strategy" is utopia, it is a mirage, for which you can run all your life.
"profitable strategy" is utopia, it's a mirage that you can run after all your life.
Why?
It's high time to realize that "profitable strategy" is utopia, it's a mirage, for which you can run all your life.
I totally agree, that's why I'm doing the reverse task - trying to determine if the strategy has stopped working and another TS needs to be connected.
why?
Because no one has such a strategy. I don't mean a fantasy strategy, but one that makes more money out of money, and it's stable and on a regular basis.
Because no one has such a strategy. I mean the one which makes more money from money and it is stable and permanent.
I'll tell you a little more, there is no strategy that does not make mistakes. Any profitable strategy must make mistakes. The question is: What is the price of its mistakes?
But I have another question. You keep posting pictures that you do not quite understand. So... I am half-heartedly following it. And my question is quite simple. What is the practical meaning of your research? How can you put what you are doing into practice? Many people just buy research forgetting why they do it..... So that's the question for you. So... sober you up...
I totally agree, that's why I'm doing the reverse task - trying to determine that the strategy has stopped working and another TS needs to be connected.
I totally agree. There is an expression "do not marry the position" - just do not "marry" the TS. For any TS, there are market conditions in which it is unprofitable.
I'll tell you a little more, there is no strategy that does not make mistakes. Any profitable strategy must make mistakes. The question is, what's the cost of making mistakes?
But I have another question for you. You're laying out pictures with not very clear drawings. So... I'm half-listening to it. And my question is quite simple. What is the practical meaning of your research? How can you put what you are doing into practice? Many people just buy research forgetting why they do it..... So that's the question for you. So... Sobering up ...