Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1262
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is a dead-end version, except for Market and not more. For my beloved, there are better and more interesting options. It seems that you have come to this point too. Didn't you say it before?
Yes, I'm doing something in python, I'm working on it mostly with Bayes... I don't really care where, as long as I have the libs
by speed - mql is fasterYes, I'm doing something in Python, I'm mostly doing Bayesian now, it's fun... in principle, it doesn't matter where, as long as the libs are there
I have no idea how to use mql, but it's faster by speed.Do you need speed? What for? What are you going to do with it?
Imho, you need speed only for pipsing. I can't use it for forex, for Forts even the hand reaction is enough, which takes 0.2-0.5 seconds.
Do you need speed? What for? What will you do with it?
Imho, the speed is needed only for pipsing. In forex it's impossible, in Forts even the hand reaction is enough for free, and that's min 0.2-0.5s.
Monte Carlo simulation on python ~10 minutes, on mql <2
well, this is the cost of dynamic typing
Monte Carlo simulation on python ~10 minutes, on mql <2
Well, that's the cost of dynamic typing.
Strange. Monte Carlo in Python for 55 t points only takes 13 seconds, together with the calculation of quite complex indicators.
Next is training, but it takes me almost 24 hours, which doesn't bother me at all)). Compared to the system design time, it's nothing.
Python 3.7 Anaconda.
Strange. Monte Carlo on 55 t. points only 13 s.
Next is training, but I have almost 24 hours, which does not embarrass me at all.) Compared to system design time, it's nothing.
150k I have about 10 minutes, through the pyMC3 lib, well +-... not critical, just a comparison. But the code is minimum.
on your ultrabook ) it's weak150k I have about 10 minutes, through the libu pyMC3, well +-... yeah not critical, just a comparison. But the code is minimum.
On an ultrabook ) it's weak.Why do you need a lib? Monte Carlo = HSCI + a few lines of code.
My laptop isn't very powerful either, it's from 2008. I think it's time to change it, but it suits me fine so far.
Why do you need a lib? Monte Carlo = GSCH + a few lines of code.
There's all sorts of stuff in there that I'm exploring.
Here, if you're interested https://docs.pymc.io/
there's all kinds of stuff in there that I'm exploring
Here, if you're interested https://docs.pymc.io/
What's interesting there is variation problems and Theano.
I'm still going to use variational methods to tune the system, but I haven't found the approach yet.
My laptop isn't very strong either, it's from 2008. I think it's time to change, but so far this one is fine.
Mine is 2 years old, i5u processor, zen book from asus. I like it because it's easy to carry around. I also want to have a more powerful phone.
What is interesting there is variation problems and Theano.
Well, in general, the topic in general, probabilistic approach. I learned a lot of new things, I've never encountered this before. Only Rolling regression alone is already interesting