Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 844

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Try any way you can go for an hour on the H1 bar, but to get high, low, open, and close.

Will it work?

Now in the tick bar.

Is there a difference?

Atick story is not walking within a bar, building on only one type of price (Bid). It seems that they have only heard about acs when they were discussing ticks.

That's why we have to make a casmtronic+Tester, to get rid of all the theorizing.

 
fxsaber:

A tick story is not walking around inside a bar, building on only one type of price (Bid). It seems that they have only heard about acs here, when they were talking about ticks.

That's why you have to do casmton+Tester to get the theorizing the hell out of the way.

agree

However, the point of thinning is not clear

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Try any way you can walk for an hour in the H1-bar, but in a way that preserves the high, the low, the open, and the klose.

Rena, you'd be a knight out of here.

I'm sick of your stream of consciousness and bluffing in all the threads. It's not your thing at all, and you're littering the threads.

or read a book or something. I am stupid too, so I read a lot and then understand.

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

Rena, you should ride a horse from here.

I'm sick of your stream of consciousness and bluffing in all the threads. It's not your thing at all, and you're littering the threads

Or read a book or something. I'm dumb too, that's why I read a lot and then I get lost.

Mahim, I'm fed up with you.

It's not for you to decide for me, got it?

This system goes well with me without any perversions and I ask questions only to not get bogged down with what is not necessary
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Maheem, you're pissing me off.

You don't get to decide for me, okay?

You shouldn't have ruined your reputation by bluffing.

 
fxsaber:

This is porno-theorizing. The custom symbol is groping in all the real places.

There's nowhere without porn in forex...

But so far I haven't found any big advantages of custom symbols (apart from obvious visualization) over self-calculation

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

You shouldn't have ruined your reputation by bluffing.

Get away from me.

It's not for you to decide what I write and what I don't

 
transcendreamer:

I haven't found any great advantages from the casts (other than the obvious visualization) over the self-calculation

Here is one of them

Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing of trading strategies

Machine learning in trading: theory and practice (trading and beyond)

fxsaber, 2018.04.15 16:31

Let's create a custom symbol with the right tick distribution and write a graphical TS. Let's do a backtest and post the result.

It's one thing to state about the graality by a symbol with a certain distribution, but it's another thing to show it in the Tester on OOS.

 
fxsaber:

Here is one of them.

It is one thing to state about graality by a symbol with a certain distribution, and another thing to show it in the Tester on OOS.

wrote back in a private message.
 
Are there pacts that determine the importance of predictors for prediction/regression?
Corelation would probably work. Maybe something else?