Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 806
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
https://towardsdatascience.com/validation-methods-for-trading-strategy-development-1efea8284b02
I ditaph... everything, but I only throw in what I like or agree with, or have written about it myself before.
I wrote about it and cited an excerpt from the article to prove my point
If you doubt my cognitive abilities :D
Now, the article says "out-of-sample" in black and white.
And you've added a few more concepts to it.
For fans of crossvalidation, test sampling, OOS and other wild things, I will not tire of repeating:
I understand that for you it's all the same thing, so you've lumped it all together. But no, they are different things, there are several kinds of crossvalidation alone.
I saw a denial of the usefulness of the available method, but you didn't provide an alternative solution. That's why I ask for the link, to see if a solution/replacement is proposed in the full text.
no solution is offered because no one knows it
But the points of inapplicability of some methods for non-stationary problems are emphasized
Now the article says "out-of-sample" in black and white.
And you've added a few other concepts to it.
I understand that for you it's all the same thing, so you've lumped it all together. However, no, these are different things, there are several types of crossvalidation alone.
To me and to all normal people it's all the same thing - a fit
which is inapplicable to non-stationary problems.
read the manuals.
Well, don't speak for others......
I was right about you after all :)
no solution is offered because no one knows it
but the points of inapplicability of some methods for non-stationary problems are emphasized
So you're screwed. You're a cardboard fool. I know.... Come to think of it....
Well, don't speak for others......
I guessed about you, though :)
So you're screwed. You cardboard fool. I know.... Come to think of it....
Do not bury your knowledge in 10 pages of this forum again, please
write meaningfully ))))))
And I think a lot of people here know that. Those who look at things realistically, without rose-colored glasses.
I need a period of testing and validation to assess the adequacy of the model, the OOS only a little bit, in order to be finally convinced. But there is still enough of it to work on it...
I wrote about it some time ago, but all by ear...