Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 38
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Judging by the fact that Dr.Trader has already failed when trying to port an old version of libVMR to R and did not have enough memory for a large nuclear machine, as well as full performance for a small one (the number of cycles reduced by 100 times), then who wants to step on the same rake is unlikely to be found?
So, it is better not to breathe a word about porting such tasks to R - this clunker will not pull.
Only a very superficial acquaintance with R will allow to talk about "nags".
Of course, we put R and see the interpreter of character strings. If you go deeper, you can see the bytecode, but it doesn't solve any of the interpreter's problems in terms of efficiency. There is nothing to even discuss - nag.
But if you look a bit deeper into R packages, you quickly find out that what we see in R code is a reference to another code. And if you start looking into it, it turns out that for computationally intensive algorithms R always uses third-party packages, which were chosen on the principle of maximum efficiency. These are usually C or Fortran libraries.
Or, for example, matrix operations. Considering that R has no notion of scalar, and everything starts with vectors and matrix arithmetic is completely natural for R, the question of using an appropriate library that is written NOT in R is a matter of principle. Intel Math Kernel Library is used.
To add to this, paralleling calculations not only to all the cores of one's own computer, but also to neighboring computers, is a common operation in R.
So, what is a "nag" and what is not is a big question.
PS.
You don't have to port anything to R, you just have to learn the basics. R has everything you need and a lot more than that.
Question : how do I give the new columns the names like "a_minus_b" , "a_minus_c"
We will be paid for the posts by forex itself :) If you read all 38 pages and try it in practice and combine all the knowledge, then I think you can make a working EA.
Could you please refute PROPERly the content of the article I linked to. At this pointDr.Trader: has attempted to use this material. To use it quite specifically. The result is negative. Maybe you can give an opinion on the subject as well?
I apologize for being off-topic.
SanSanych, what language are you thinking in?
Your post looks like a Google translator. Respect the Russian language, please.
PS if you want to be understood...
I apologize for being off-topic.
SanSanych, what language are you thinking in?
Your post looks like a google-translator. Respect the Russian language, please.
PS if you want to be understood...
I've been saying it all my life... You're the first...
If you don't understand something, I'm ready to explain.
I've been saying that all my life... You're the first...
If you don't understand something, I'm ready to explain.
You don't have to explain. Somebody has to be the first))
We will be paid by forex itself for our posts :) Everyone knows and knows something different, and if you read all 38 pages and try it in practice, and combine all the knowledge - I think you can make a working EA.
Thank you so much, human, thank you!
Bp. this neat idea of a double loop needs more work!)
Made a description for the binary classifier jPrediction, posted the source code.
Table of contents:
Full text in the attached archive (PDF format)
Made a description for the binary classifier jPrediction, posted the source code.
Hello Yuri, thank you for your work!
1) Can you explain in more detail what it still means
2) If I have a weak computer, then how long will it take the model to learn the model, say on a sample of 300 predictors and 100,000 observations
(It would be nice to replace the inscription "please wait" with the calculation of the training progress in % or something like that, so as not to wait for 100 years until completion)
3) And what about the "R"?
Hello Yuri, thank you for your hard work!
1) Can you explain in more detail what it does mean
Sensitivity of generalization abiliy - correctly predicted positive outcomes on test sample: 100% * TP / (TP + FP)
Specificity of generalization ability - correctly predicted negative outcomes on the test sample: 100% * TN / (TN + FN)
Where:
TP - number of true positive outcomes
TN - number of true negatives
FP - number of false positive outcomes
FN - number of false negatives
2) if my computer is weak, how long will it take to train the model on a sample of 300 predictors and 100 000 observations
3) What about "R" ? won't it?
Will not learn at all, but will give an error message if the number of predictors in the sample exceeds 10 pcs.
3) And what about "R" ?
If you're so eager, install the gJava package. Calling Java code from R