Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Same broker, different results
Sergey Golubev, 2020.07.25 09:15
- It may be quotes,
- it may be the time you start backtest (minutes/seconds),
- it may be the number of ticks which is the different for every backtesting case;
- it may be the following: using indicators as icustom which perform differently for different brokers based on the quality of quotes (example: iTrend indicator; some indicators in AscTrend system, more);
- if your EA is martingale, scalping, or martingale scalping, or using Money Managementy so it may backtest differently every time you are backtesting.
- and more ..
---------------------------
It is necessary to know the strategy (manual trading system) and agree with this strategy (and it is necessary to know the seller) in case to believe in backtesting results (just my opinion).
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Is Backtest equal to real trading?
Sergey Golubev, 2018.07.16 06:51
Depends on which metatrader (MT4 or MT5).
Some detailes - read thread: Backtesting results in different results on different brokers
..and read here for more: Testing trading strategies on real ticks and the explanation is on this post.
- www.mql5.com
This is the backtest result, open 4 trades.
This is my live account, only 1 trade opened, and the trade should closed two bars ahead according to EA's rules, but it didn't.
Could somebody tell me why this happened? Thank you!
There are so many factors that come into play. Slippage, spread, method of backtesting, quality of your historical data, etc...
If the data you are backtesting comes from a credible source (for example Tick Data Suite using Duka) and you are using a variable spread, chances are backtests and live testing should be somehow similar.
How are you backtesting? Using 'Every Tick' in MT4? or Candle Close for example?
My advice is to play around with your backtesting and make sure your Live broker has low spread and slippage. These are quick fixes before diving deeper into the EA operations..
There are so many factors that come into play. Slippage, spread, method of backtesting, quality of your historical data, etc...
If the data you are backtesting comes from a credible source (for example Tick Data Suite using Duka) and you are using a variable spread, chances are backtests and live testing should be somehow similar.
How are you backtesting? Using 'Every Tick' in MT4? or Candle Close for example?
My advice is to play around with your backtesting and make sure your Live broker has low spread and slippage. These are quick fixes before diving deeper into the EA operations..
Thanks for your advice! I backtested with MT4 using every tick, the quality is 90%, i think the problem is slippage and spread.
I want EA to close trade follow the rules even spread or slippage is very big at that time. For example it should close the trade at lower band two bars ahead in the second picture, but it didn't. Then it's totally different from the rules.
Now i changed the EA's ordersend maxsilppage and spread to a very big value. I hope now the live trade resut will be more similar to backtest. Don't know if it's going to work or is there anyway to make it better…
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
This is the backtest result, open 4 trades.
This is my live account, only 1 trade opened, and the trade should closed two bars ahead according to EA's rules, but it didn't.
Could somebody tell me why this happened? Thank you!