My side of the fence, you can always be right for yourself - MQL4 and MetaTrader 4

Keith Watford 2020.03.15 21:52 #21

tompips2018:

Anyways, the logic was RIGHT. For me. It's just wrong for you.

It was wrong for you as well.

That is why your calculations worked out that the trades were in profit when they actually were not.

Alain Verleyen 2020.03.15 23:59 #22

There's none so deaf as those who will not hear.

tompips2018 2020.03.16 03:25 #23

Keith Watford:

It was wrong for you as well.

That is why your calculations worked out that the trades were in profit when they actually were not.

OK so you admit both of us our wrong. At least I admit I missed something. You ain't.

Now it's profitting. So what did I say again? Case closed.

Why keep this thread alive.

To fight for your ego?

So what do you want to read from me? Concede? Some people do, but I don't. As I said, this thread is done.

When someone disagrees with you, respect their stance. If you want to feel right about yourself, feel free to do so. I believe you are a good programmer. But it looks like moderating forums like these and trying your best to be neutral is way out of your forte. Don't get too absorbed, dude. Just moderate :-D.You can't even simply call it a day, and trying hard to get a self-confirmation of your conviction to be right. You can always be right for yourself. Unfortunately, from my side of the fence, you're wrong for me. ;-)

With all due respect, for a moderator, it seems you're the one who needs moderatin'.

Or should we call an admin to do your job of moderating yourself? ;-)

[Need] Yearly Monthly high Why am I getting Newbie question: Adjusting target

マイキーバローニー 2020.03.16 03:38 #24

Ah, this thread is getting way off-topic, a feisty amateur noob vs. a mod who can't moderate.

This is gonna be exciting.

Files:

eating_popcorn.gif 389 kb

Keith Watford 2020.03.16 04:04 #25

tompips2018:

OK so you admit both of us our wrong. At least I admit I missed something. You ain't.

No, I said that your calculations were wrong. I was not wrong.

Why keep this thread alive.

Others may learn from it in future.

To fight for your ego?

My ego!?

You seem to be the one with the ego.

When someone disagrees with you, respect their stance. If you want to feel right about yourself, feel free to do so. I believe you are a good programmer. But it looks like moderating forums like these and trying your best to be neutral is way out of your forte. Don't get too absorbed, dude. Just moderate :-D.You can't even simply call it a day, and trying hard to get a self-confirmation of your conviction to be right. You can always be right for yourself. Unfortunately, from my side of the fence, you're wrong for me. ;-)

You should take some of your own advice on board. I made a valid suggestion regarding a better way to close all trades and you simply refused to accept that there was any problem with your function. One day you will see that your function does not work correctly. I just hope that it doesn't result in losses for you.

With all due respect, for a moderator, it seems you're the one who needs moderatin'.

I am a forum user primarily and I am posting here as a user, not a moderator.

News Trader EA Different results on use Using a Moving Average

tompips2018 2020.03.16 04:26 #26

Keith Watford:

No, I said that your calculations were wrong. I was not wrong.

Others may learn from it in future.

My ego!?

You seem to be the one with the ego.

You should take some of your own advice on board. I made a valid suggestion regarding a better way to close all trades and you simply refused to accept that there was any problem with your function. One day you will see that your function does not work correctly. I just hope that it doesn't result in losses for you.

I am a forum user primarily and I am posting here as a user, not a moderator.

"No, I said that your calculations were wrong. I was not wrong."

"My ego!?"

"You seem to be the one with the ego."

We already know that, didn't we? Why keep this discussion going? Reader will already learn backreading without reading after my request for closure. Why keep on ranting? Ah I know. Clue: your EGO :-D :-D

"You should take some of your own advice on board. I made a valid suggestion regarding a better way to close all trades and you simply refused...."

Didn't I answered that already? For effing sakes. You just can't accept it can you? :-D :-D :-D

Why don't you backread yourself. 3:)

"..I just hope that it doesn't result in losses for you."

Well IT IS GIVING ME PROFITS NOW. If you really *hope* so, the best you could do is keep quiet, leave this thread behind without saying a word because - EV'RYTHING'S BEEN ANSWERED ALREADY. :-D ¯\_( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)_/¯

That's the purpose of this forum, right? Now move on. 3:) :-D

" I am a forum user primarily and I am posting here as a user, not a moderator."

Then zip it. I already got I want. Wear your mod hat and use your mod sense. Close it. ;-)

error message Notifications: failed Pair trading and multicurrency Copying an object

Keith Watford 2020.03.16 05:03 #27

tompips2018:

Oh dear!

As there seems to be only 1 way to put this to bed.

Please try this simple code in the tester it uses your function.

#property version   "1.00"
#property strict
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//| Expert initialization function                                   |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
int OnInit()
  {
//---
   for(int x=0;x<3;x++)
   OrderSend(_Symbol,OP_BUY,0.02,Ask,50,0,0,NULL,123,0,clrNONE);
   for(int x=0;x<3;x++)
   OrderSend(_Symbol,OP_SELL,0.01,Bid,50,0,0,NULL,123,0,clrNONE);
   
//---
   return(INIT_SUCCEEDED);
  }
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//| Expert deinitialization function                                 |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
void OnDeinit(const int reason)
  {
//---
   
  }
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
//| Expert tick function                                             |
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
void OnTick()
  {
   double profit=0;
   for(int x=OrdersTotal()-1;x>=0; x--)
    {
     if(OrderSelect(x,SELECT_BY_POS))
       profit+=OrderProfit()+OrderCommission()+OrderSwap();
    }
    Comment("Profit= "+DoubleToStr(profit,2));
   if(profit>=10)
     CloseAllTrades();
  }
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
// ======================================================================================= 
double CloseAllTrades()
{
   //Go through all open orders
   Print(">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Inside CloseAllTrades function<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<");
   int TotalRunningTrades = OrdersTotal();
   int BuyOrSell = OrderType();
   bool r = false;
   
   for (int i=TotalRunningTrades-1;  i >= 0; i--)
   {
      //Select each trade to close
      if (OrderSelect(i,SELECT_BY_POS) == true)
      {
         if (OrderSymbol() == Symbol())
         {
            if(BuyOrSell == 0) //It's a BUY
            {  //Close the trade orders
               //               ticket        lot volume          close price                 slippage   arrow color
               r = OrderClose(OrderTicket(), OrderLots(), MarketInfo(OrderSymbol(), MODE_ASK),   15,     clrAliceBlue);
            }
            if(BuyOrSell == 1) //It's a SELL
            {  //Close the trade orders
               //               ticket        lot volume          close price                 slippage   arrow color
               r = OrderClose(OrderTicket(), OrderLots(), MarketInfo(OrderSymbol(), MODE_BID),   15,     clrAliceBlue);
            }
            Print(r);
         }
      }  
   } // End of for (int i=TotalRunningTrades-1; Loop
   return(r);
}   //End of CloseAllTrades() function

Obviously it should be run in a period when the buys will profit.

Result

2 11:55:08.815 2020.03.03 00:00:00 ##TEST test started

2 11:55:08.868 2020.03.03 00:05:00 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: open #1 buy 0.02 EURUSD at 1.11294 ok

2 11:55:08.868 2020.03.03 00:05:00 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: open #2 buy 0.02 EURUSD at 1.11294 ok

2 11:55:08.868 2020.03.03 00:05:00 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: open #3 buy 0.02 EURUSD at 1.11294 ok

2 11:55:08.868 2020.03.03 00:05:00 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: open #4 sell 0.01 EURUSD at 1.11274 ok

2 11:55:08.868 2020.03.03 00:05:00 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: open #5 sell 0.01 EURUSD at 1.11274 ok

2 11:55:08.868 2020.03.03 00:05:00 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: open #6 sell 0.01 EURUSD at 1.11274 ok

0 11:55:20.911 2020.03.03 17:00:17 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Inside CloseAllTrades function<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

2 11:55:20.911 2020.03.03 17:00:17 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: close #6 sell 0.01 EURUSD at 1.11274 at price 1.11696

0 11:55:20.911 2020.03.03 17:00:17 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: true

2 11:55:20.911 2020.03.03 17:00:17 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: close #5 sell 0.01 EURUSD at 1.11274 at price 1.11696

0 11:55:20.911 2020.03.03 17:00:17 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: true

2 11:55:20.911 2020.03.03 17:00:17 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: close #4 sell 0.01 EURUSD at 1.11274 at price 1.11696

0 11:55:20.911 2020.03.03 17:00:17 ##TEST EURUSD,H1: true