Harmonic Analysis - page 134
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
GBPNZD
2 Bullish Cyphers on the 15mThere seems to be one plus indi shows a max butterfly.
I do not have this pair for LTF due to the high spread, I do have over 12 pips spread.
What is your view on this?
There seems to be one plus indi shows a max butterfly.
Max and TOTAL patterns are very wishy-washy yet they work. I'd deal with them by using RSX, Demark and my eyes.
It has been a cypher week for me. 100% accuracy this week so far. What pattern is the blue pattern lobo?
I checked again, since I thought I have verified the B ret as well this time, and I think it was a valid cypher I have just misplaced the B on the drawing. B should be the next HH following A, and I have misplaced that I think.
Thanks for the comment!
Another option - bull bat?
I checked again, since I thought I have verified the B ret as well this time, and I think it was a valid cypher I have just misplaced the B on the drawing. B should be the next HH following A, and I have misplaced that I think.Thanks for the comment!
Are you talking about the blue bearish pattern? The bullish cypher on the pic is valid. I was talking about the bearish blue pattern. Edit - okay now I got what you meant. I didn't see your updated pic.
Could shark and leonardo be the same pattern?
Could shark and leonardo be the same pattern?
No they are different. The shark is a cypher for me. I posted a pic today. Ratio of Leonardo is below. More detail check here FibonacciTeam: Formacja harmoniczna Leonarda (It's in Polish language so if you're not Polish, translate it to preferable language).
No they are different. Ratio of Leonardo is below. The shark is a cypher for me. I posted a pic today.
Yes I thought so, but my indi shows a shark while I do have a leonardo text there (could be from the past)...
Could be that reason, but then I do not know who drew my shark on my graph... hmm. or, why I do not see a text telling me it is there...?
I will look for the possible reason.
Since you are following T2T I guess you know their narrowed spec for a cypher vs. a shark...
C 127-141 vs. 113-161
D 78,6 vs. 78,6-113
I interpret it like a shark is a shark, but in the family of the sharks can be different spicies like hammerhead sharks/catsharks/cyphers
.
Yes I thought so, but my indi shows a shark while I do have a leonardo text there (could be from the past)...Could be that reason, but then I do not know who drew my shark on my graph... hmm. or, why I do not see a text telling me it is there...?I will look for the possible reason.Since you are following T2T I guess you know their narrowed spec for a cypher vs. a shark...C 127-141 vs. 113-161D 78,6 vs. 78,6-113I interpret it like a shark is a shark, but in the family of the sharks can be different spicies like hammerhead sharks/catsharks/cyphers
Shark pattern follows OXABC instead of XABCD which I'm not quite sure why but anyways the way to draw shark is different from cypher. C of cypher is extension of XA while C (B) of shark is AB (XA) projection. D is BC (AB) inversion and 88.6-113 is determined for D (C), not 78.6-113. I don't know what you have learnt from the technical workshop but that's the way to draw shark pattern I learnt and that's how Scott Carney draws.
Shark pattern follows OXABC instead of XABCD which I'm not quite sure why but anyways the way to draw shark is different from cypher. C of cypher is extension of XA while C (B) of shark is AB (XA) projection. D is BC (AB) inversion and 88.6-113 is determined for D (C), not 78.6-113. I don't know what you have learnt from the technical workshop but that's the way to draw shark pattern I learnt and that's how Scott Carney draws.
I could find one reason (justification for myself) for the different naming of the shark...to be able to keep the same nomenclature for the 5-0 living often together with the shark...
This way the shark is the 0-X-A-B-C(PRZ) five point pattern and the one many times following it the 5-0 has the X-A-B-C-D(PRZ) 5 point formation and standerd naming...
Other than that I cannot think of any other valid reason...
And yes you are correct - C of shark 88,6-113. But in many cases still I do see failed cyphers to have a D as a shark...while the C is in the limited range. I think statistical evaluation would help. The T2T guys are claiming their cypher success rate over 80%. At least I cannot contradict, however I do not think just using the definition of shark C (B or whatever) would give us that rate, so when C is between 127-141 they expect a D at 78.6 instead of the shark (C) 88,6-113....
This naming is bloody confusing, so I just keep using abcd as for any normal 5 point pattern....
I could find one reason (justification for myself) for the different naming of the shark...to be able to keep the same nomenclature for the 5-0 living often together with the shark...
Post and share cypher patterns you find and which fail into shark if you have time so that we could analyze together.