Coding help... Cyclical indicator - page 4

New comment
 
mladen:
Sorry, I am lost What lwma slope indicator are you referring to?

https://www.mql5.com/en/forum

this one i found it in one of ur posting. i am posting link to the screenshot, i bet u can easily put an alert on it big brother

 

I am quite sure that at the post from which that picture is, is written how you can access it too ...

all the best

lover:
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum this one i found it in one of ur posting. i am posting link to the screenshot, i bet u can easily put an alert on it big brother
 
mladen:
I am quite sure that at the post from which that picture is, is written how you can access it too ... all the best

https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/181241

i have it its ur indi i need an alert for it its not elite indi

 
mladen:
lucmat

The "version 2" does that

In this part of code :

double iCSma(int useValue, int halfLength, int i)

{

i = Bars-i-1;

//

//

//

//

//

double sum = work;

double sumw = 1;

//

//

//

//

//

for(int j=1; j<=halfLength; j++)

{

sum += work;

sumw += 1;

int k = MathMin(i+j,Bars-1);

sum += work[k];

sumw += 1;

}

return(sum/sumw);

}
line that is saying "int k = MathMin(i+j,Bars-1);" reuses the last (current) value over and over if it would go out of the scope of the available elements (so, in the future). Don't be puzzled with the inverted way it uses indexes : those are "raw" (C like array) and that is why it uses that way of accessing array elemnts

Dear Mladen

I'm desperate!

Why this great indicator that you created in the last bar is different from the one I created in excel?

There must be a solution ....

Thanks

 

lucmat

It works (the indicator) as you described it so I really have no idea where the difference comes from. If the excel version works as described than there should be no difference

lucmat:
Dear Mladen

I'm desperate!

Why this great indicator that you created in the last bar is different from the one I created in excel?

There must be a solution ....

Thanks
 

hi mladen,

user clahn04 posted some years ago 2 interesting indis, where slope2 calls slope:

https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/175938/page17

i've used the 2 indis for a long time now, but the problem is every time i want to change parameters, i have to create 2 new indis as the parameters are hardcoded.

could you kindly modify these indis and combine both into one single indi?

i'm confident lucmat and all cycle traders will find the resulting indi useful for their cycle analysis.

many thanks as always.

 

engula

Here you go Attached the SnakeSMA too (since both of the indicators depend on that indicator too). Added external parameters (I did nit change the logic of the indicators, I assume that they work as you expect them to work logic wise)

engula:
hi mladen,

user clahn04 posted some years ago 2 interesting indis, where slope2 calls slope:

https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/175938/page17

i've used the 2 indis for a long time now, but the problem is every time i want to change parameters, i have to create 2 new indis as the parameters are hardcoded.

could you kindly modify these indis and combine both into one single indi?

i'm confident lucmat and all cycle traders will find the resulting indi useful for their cycle analysis.

many thanks as always.
Files:
cl_slope.mq4  3 kb
cl_slope2.mq4  3 kb
snakesma.mq4  4 kb
 
mladen:
engula

Here you go

Attached the SnakeSMA too (since both of the indicators depend on that indicator too). Added external parameters (I did nit change the logic of the indicators, I assume that they work as you expect them to work logic wise)

mladen, which is now the 'new' indi that combines the two 'old' ones?

 

They are all changed (to be able to accept external parameters) so they are all new (sort of speaking). But if you wish to have separate ones, use these, so you can compare then to the old ones

engula:
mladen, which is now the 'new' indi that combines the two 'old' ones?
Files:
cl_slope_1.01.mq4  3 kb
cl_slope_2.01.mq4  3 kb
 
mladen:
They are all changed (to be able to accept external parameters) so they are all new (sort of speaking). But if you wish to have separate ones, use these, so you can compare then to the old ones

sorry, i'm not sure if i understand, my bad...

my wish was to have the 2 indis combined into 1, but i see that you modified them both. or did i misunderstand sth?

1234567891011...21
New comment