Aggressive scalp ea - page 87
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Been quoted 300$ by a professional MT4 programmer to do the following to my EA.
Add hidden SL/TP functionality while keeping safety TP/SL.
Add ECN compatibility. OrderSend without TP/SL and a further modify.
Anybody interested in the final product that wants to contribute please let me know.
Regards,
KAFETEROI am new to this forum. I am a programmer, I have spent a couple days on this code ....
1. Trying to understand someone else's code is hard enough, original comments and original variable names help in the understanding. This source code is decompiled code from someone elses work, variable names are stupid, there are no comments, so much harder to work. I would charge more than $300 if you asked me.
2. Another feature of this decompiled code is that nearly half of the lines have nothing to do with the running of the program. I deleted nearly half the code and still get the same results. This points to very poor programming practices by the original programmer or a poor decompiler was used, making the code suspect that it should even work.
3. It also appears that someone has gone in after decompiling and tried to make some changes that also do not change the performance, adding another level of ambiguity that I had to strip off.
I am basically working my way down to the brass nuts of this code to see what conditions are needed to open/close trades. Right now it seems to not make sense (can go for days without doing anything) but as you can see from backtesting that it can do well. If the algorithm turns out to have a good foundation, then it might have some merit. I did enjoy an earlier comment about this ea being another ea designed for backtesting only - I would argue that each and every ea is designed and sold this way, why would I use an ea that did poorly in backtesting?
This ea, and other works as Mdp (reveral spike).
It works, but there is a problem to run live.
Requote. I've seen the EA lose several trades for the same reason.
In backtesting without requote, it works fine.
hi, i made mod to hide sl and tp and simplify the code
i currently valid the code on forward reel test
it's a scalper that gave excellent results on 90% backtest MT4, but it needs to be backtested on 99% quality because backtest on MT4 with scalper is useless
i will tell you here
This EA feeds on the speed of price movement. When it senses
X-amount of pips in X-amount of time, it will enter the trade.
Anyone who has done a visual backtest can see how this is
working. The great majority of trades take place on just one bar.
Trade results in the real world, due to execution limitations, will
never even come close to what is seen in the tester.
Rob
Until people start doing forward testing on this.. there will be no progress.....
geblek narsis tenan nganggo bahasa Indonesia
waduh...
kok dibilank geblek... khan itu indonesia sekalee, masbro... dari pada nganggo boso jowo, lha malah do rak mudeng kabeh toh... betewe baswey tum mere jahe nih... i want to pasang maksimum OP kanggo EA escape, niku the code-nya pripun toh kang mas bro... plis tulung the help nya... 
Suggest me some companies to open real account for this EA!
Good work guys, Everything is fine.
But, which company is offering with 2 pips take profit in real account?
In FFDD also minimum take profit is 4pips.
Can any one suggest me some companies for this robot!
This ea, and other works as Mdp (reveral spike).
It works, but there is a problem to run live.
Requote. I've seen the EA lose several trades for the same reason.
In backtesting without requote, it works fine.What broker doesn't have requotes? Pepperstone Razor? Dukascopy? Divisa?
In combination with vps with low latency: commercialnetworkservices.com
Been quoted 300$ by a professional MT4 programmer to do the following to my EA.
Add hidden SL/TP functionality while keeping safety TP/SL.
Add ECN compatibility. OrderSend without TP/SL and a further modify.
Anybody interested in the final product that wants to contribute please let me know.
Regards,
KAFETEROHi,
I'm interested on contributing, but I think we have to tackle some issues first:
- TP = 2. What broker accepts that? Is TP = 5 sufficient as well?
- Requotes by brokers
- latency
Modifications have been made:
Hidden SL/TP
ECN Compatibility
I'm working on forward tests now and will upload forward test reports soon.
I'm using a TP of 40 without problems. SL using the default.
Regards,
Kafetero