MetaTrader 4 Build 574 with Updated MQL4 Language and Market of Applications Released - page 43
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
May be with a comparison of the old one to the new ones with what has been changed?
gooly
Does an alphabetic list of all functions, keywords, constants,.. exist?
May be with a comparison of the old one to the new ones with what has been changed?
gooly
1) Yes. Documentation || Searching Docs || Sorting Docs.
2) No. Meta-Quotes could improve in this area.
1) Yes. Documentation || Searching Docs || Sorting Docs.
2) No. Meta-Quotes could improve in this area.
add 1)
If I open e.g. mt4-Docs-String I get
I assume these are the old ones (build 509) and where are the new ones?
And on the Doc.-site I found only mql5 and the old mql4.
Do you have a link for "Documentation || Searching Docs || Sorting Docs"?
Thanks in advance,
Gooly
Thanks ubzen!
Now I have another question :)
I have written a powershell script for the vps that checks whether the mt4 are a) up and running and b) responding otherwise it kills and 're-births" them.
Now I have an indicator that uses several highs and lows of 28 pairs and this causes this problem:
After the start of the mt4 (with this indicator on its first chart) the mt4 is about 5 min 'off-line' on Win 7 (no it's not an endless loop!), no reaction on mouse, keyboard,.., no graphics been updated if a window of another appl. is pulled across its window and so on.
Will the new mt4 b600+ have a better 'behaviour' as it will spend every now and then an 'eye' on what's going on around it? It would make it easier to detect a hanging but not crashed mt4.
Any hints on that topic would be appreciated too.
Gooly
Thanks ubzen!
Now I have another question :)
I have written a powershell script for the vps that checks whether the mt4 are a) up and running and b) responding otherwise it kills and 're-births" them.
Now I have an indicator that uses several highs and lows of 28 pairs and this causes this problem:
After the start of the mt4 (with this indicator on its first chart) the mt4 is about 5 min 'off-line' on Win 7 (no it's not an endless loop!), no reaction on mouse, keyboard,.., no graphics been updated if a window of another appl. is pulled across its window and so on.
Will the new mt4 b600+ have a better 'behaviour' as it will spend every now and then an 'eye' on what's going on around it? It would make it easier to detect a hanging but not crashed mt4.
Any hints on that topic would be appreciated too.
Gooly
Terminal started by pressing the' Terminal-Button' of the editor at exactly 23:00:00
First mt4-window with last time stamp 23:11:13 - than nothing here after for the next 5 minutes.
1 cpu-kernel is running at ~100%, no graphical update until 23:16:11 - now the mt4 is back for me to play with.
But in the Expert-Tab I read 'only':
As you can see I don't use all available bars (~95'000) of the m1-chart, only 7000 (~10%).
The line
is from the first functions in start():
But the functions in start() is passed 3 times and this does not take that much time if I trust the time stamps in the Expert-Tab!!
And the time-gap seems to be after the last printed line in the Expert-Tab.
So I would like if the new mt4 would be so nice and polite to answer if my powershell-script is asking whether the mt4 is hanging or not!
I think I can identify the problem. My m1-charts have 90'000 bars and mt4 'disappears' until all the 97'000 bars are correctly graphically calculated and placed.
So it would be nice if the new mt4 once and a while would be able to send back an 'I am ok'.
Gooly
Backtesting seems much faster on 604 :-)
Do you confirm ? Is it multithread ?
i am wondering how you guys are able to launch that many instances on a machine? i tried starting about 20 mt4 which did nothing but slow the system so much that basically everything was freezing.
i am using 64 cores, 32 gb. what might be the reason?