Elite indicators :) - page 714

 

Force Histo Smoothed_mtf+alerts+divergence from here: https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/general updated to be compatible with new mt4 builds.

 
airquest:
Thank you MrTools,

I have a couple of questions about this indicator.

- What are the settings ForcePhase and ForceDouble for ?

- Can you modify it so that we can choose between simple, exponential, smoothed and LW method like the original force index indicator ? From what I've seen, it is set by default on exponential method, is that right ?

- Can you also add a setting to be able to customize the period/length of smoothing ?

Airquest for the first question that force guess you can say more of a pure jurik force the ForcePhase and ForceDouble are simply the Phase and Double used in jurik smoothing, the phase really can't explain very well but the Double to me means twice the speed to try and cut down on lag introduced by the smoothing, in a lot of cases its just too fast using double = true.

This version is using regular force where you can choose which ma to use like the original, and now you can control the amount of jurik smoothing you want using smooth length,smooth phase,or smooth double

updated version here: https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/general

 
mladen:
That error comes because debugger always uses code as if it is compiled using strict mode (it does not know the difference when the code is compiled as strict and without ot) For a moment it is not wise to use strict mode (they are changing the rules with each and every new build and completely unpredictable things happen then)

Mladen

How can I choose the other mode other than the strict mode?hanks.

 

Coppock curve - averages & alerts from here: https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/general updated to be compatible with new mt4 builds.

 
nevar:
Mladen How can I choose the other mode other than the strict mode?hanks.

In debugger you can not. It simply is not meant to work in anything but a strict mode.

In code it is done by specifying #property strict but then also a lot of much more serious code rewriting follows (and often you depend on your intuition only in that process)

 
ValeoFX:
Yes, plse. Sorry, I should have mentioned that. Appreciate your time.

ValeoFX

Here you go

updated version here: https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/general

 

This is an advanced version of the NinjaTrader like T3 indicator (it was posted here : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/173058/page27 ).

The addition is that it can calculate Fulks/Matulich way of calculating T3 too (when T3Original is set to false) or Tim Tillson's (the inventor of T3) way if it i is set to true. Fuks/Matulich way is "faster" (less lag). Maximum count for calculation is limited to 25 (for practical reasons)

t3_nt_advanced.mq4

The example is showing 6 T3 instances with same parameters except that count is set from 1 to 6

Files:
 
mladen:
Updated traders dynamic index ssa normalized with confidence bands : traders_dynamic_cb_ssa_norm_index-alertsarrows_nmc.mq4 Original was posted here : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/general

Mladen

Is it pssible or you to add confidence bands to poly oscillator?Thnks.

Files:
 
nevar:
Mladen Is it pssible or you to add confidence bands to poly oscillator?Thnks.

nevar

Try this one out : polyfitoscillator_v2__cb.mq4

Probably some experimenting with parameters is needed (I did not do too much experimenting with this one one now. Used the values of the poly fit as the basic values for deviations, so it really needs experimenting (I even do not know how to call a deviation that uses poly fit values instead of some kind of averages )

Files:
 

I appreciate you are overloaded with '' new build'' requests , thanks for the indicator.

So are you are saying that confidence bands numbers are more suitable to average values than the fit values?

I thought like in the example of traders dynamic index ssa normalized with confidence bands indicator poly fit values

and kalman has good cylic features.So I thought confidence bands would suit these to etter than the averages.

Is it possiple to add shif value?

Reason: