You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Andrey F. Zelinsky is right, it is not according to the ToR.
So it's not a bad thing that they got $30. You could have lost time, get a bad review, and $0 :).
And being rude, yes, not good.
Where exactly I did not do the TOR, or somehow you read between the lines of the TOR?
Where exactly did I do that was not in accordance with the TOR, or are you somehow reading between the lines of the TOR?
Andrey F. Zelinsky even made you a picture.
Andrey F. Zelinsky even made you a picture.
Here is the ToR:
If the signal is crossed after 10 bars, the bar is yellow (kind of uncertainty).
Why does Zelensky emphasize some kind of stochastic signal crossing, show me this place in ToR.
It says in TK there are three signal crossovers.
Why is Zelensky emphasising some kind of stochastic signal interruption, show me that place in the ToR.
When you write someone's first and last name -- take care to spell their first and last name correctly.
When you write someone's first and last name -- make sure you spell it correctly.
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to insult you in any way, Andrey F. Zelinsky.
The idea that you could be wrong is beneficial. You've been told you're a fool, so there's a reason for it. That I can't be wrong? I can. Objectivity is not visible to one person. It is easier to admit to being wrong than to stall, even if you didn't make it.
...
It says in the ToR there are three signal crossings.
Added to the explanation (black lines)
Here you have a signal only when the black МА is crossed by a red one - i.e. it is crossed by one MA, not three.
Well, and there is no integrity signal "Stochastic + 3 MAs" -- it is shown by the purple lines.
The way I see it -- you have not fulfilled the TOR, the negative feedback is justified -- the customer's rudeness is bad, but it is not without merit.
Had the client gone to arbitration -- you would have lost the arbitration and the client would have lost only $3 instead of $30.
The right thing to do is to contact the customer and see it through to completion. Then, ask him to withdraw the negative feedback (but that is not critical in this case).
There's also a question for the person in question.
Let's assume that you win the case,
and after a while the situation repeats, what will you do?