The Sultonov system indicator - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
i.e. we do not know until the end how an individual trader will act...
we will only know it by - mass of investment... but in the past tense.
Although, in these rivers of money, one can find a little leap - to make money.
To do this, try to study the market in three dimensions.
This axiom is repeated by everyone who is lazy. Why, then, are we scientists sitting here? To surrender to the market and quit? The real SIS indicator will answer this question in the terminal on a real account. Let's wait a little. Even in this simplified version, the market condition is determined by an ensemble of 13 nearest historical prices. Over time, we will increase the number of participants in this ensemble and reach the optimal number of them, until the market gives up.
The train has left. Since then -
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/306144/page51
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/306144/page52
13 and 26 as well as -
Excluding constants from calculations
Are intellectual property and forbidden for use.
i.e. we do not fully know how an individual trader will act...
we will only know it by - mass of investment... but in the past tense.
Although in these rivers of money one can find some leverage - to make money.
about "we" - that's a one size fits all
let me put it this way
Most people will go against the trend.
I don't get it at all.
Everything is clear. But for three and a half people, two and a half -
when a retrain is done and one and a half - how it all ends)))
If Yusuf had said "I can see the depth of the market and the chart is a mirage", he would have believed it.
But Yusuf believes the chart...
Yusuf, looking at your formulas , I get the feeling that you are using the value you are looking for in the calculation.
Hence the time machine. :))
Explain. Is y the desired value?
If so, why is it used in the calculation of a4?
Yes, you are correct in your observation. This is always done when looking for a pattern y=f(x1,x2,x3,x4,....) using the Gaussian method https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B4_%D0%93%D0%B0%D1%83%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B0 or Cramer's matrix methodhttps://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B4_%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0
It is all clear. But for three and a half people, two and a half -
when a retrain is done and one and a half - how it all ends)))
Oh how tall and clever we are ) how arrogant we are ... )
we're half a man to you.... that's a bit fascist...)
where do you live? is it Russia?
It's all understandable. But for three and a half people, two and a half -
when a retrain is done and one and a half - how it all ends)))
but you're right...
the vast majority of traders and me = miserly and cheapskates... Judas... almost...
...you can sell anything and everything... But some don't.
They do.
And he who sells everything - he can beat anyone in a financial dispute.
And those who don't sell have little argument in a financial dispute.
After all, finances love a score-- and finances have no friends... - so it's the end - where there is no man... but soulless creatures.
Greetings!
You are trying to solve this problem in two-dimensional state only.
And this is a big mistake by all and sundry.
If you don't use volumes, you'll still be stepping on the same rake.
I agree. Working in normal Euclidean space, without considering volumes (read - non-linearity of market time) is a road to nowhere.
I agree. Working in ordinary Euclidean space, without taking into account volumes (read: the non-linearity of market time), is a road to nowhere.
Alexander, I did not expect that you, too, "Work only in ordinary Euclidean space".