You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
with OnTrade via CustomEvent
I had an idea to create a downgrade - to remove the need for OnTradeTransaction in MT5 when dealing with OrderSendAsync. I didn't get around to it.
The flow is one for one EA. Eight EAs in an account will work without interfering with each other.
I find it strange that you still don't know this. It has been said many times, including by Renat.
The articles used to say that there is one flow per terminal and two EAs will compete. Of course a lot has changed since then, but we need information, not rumours. I don't see anything like that in the docs.
The product under discussion can be found on my profile.
It's not perfect, but it worked well. The API for it was never written, because during the whole time of its existence it aroused interest of 2 people.
Official confirmation of 8 trading threads (+1 manual +1 for trailing, if I'm not mistaken) can be found in new build announcements here on the forum.
It is not perfect, but it worked well. No API was ever written for it, because in all the time it has existed, it has attracted the interest of two people.
Maybe just having an API would have attracted attention.
I also admit that MQ's silence on the possibility itself leads to a lack of demand. I've looked through the release notes and haven't found anything similar, although there is a lot of information - I could have missed it.
That's the grid closing, the market is very calm. It took 45 seconds
That's the grid closing, the market is very calm. It took 45 seconds
The product we're discussing can be found in my profile.
It's not perfect, but it worked well. I hadn't written an API for it, because only 2 people were interested in it during its existence.
It has piqued my interest, but only now. Because it's almost impossible to find anything good in the Market, and it's only like this, almost a direct link, that you can spot Work.
The API is bad. Doing "in the image and likeness"... MT5. Then you don't have to write documentation - it's already there!
API is bad. Doing "in the image and likeness"... MT5. Then you don't have to write documentation - it's already there!
Maybe by API you mean exactly that. But why in the image of MT5? MT4.
It used to be written in articles that the flow was one per terminal and the two EAs would compete. A lot has certainly changed since then, but we need information, not rumours. I don't see anything similar in the docs.
Maybe by API this is what was meant. But why the likeness of MT5? MT4.
So there is no asynchronous API in 4. But I personally find it incomplete/uncomfortable in 5.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and strategy testing
Why does Metaquotes slip MT5 instead of MT4?
fxsaber, 2017.09.25 15:44
I had an idea to create a downgrade - remove the need for OnTradeTransaction in MT5 when dealing with OrderSendAsync. Haven't got around to it.
HI Are the signals in MT5 copied via OrderSend or OrderSendAsync?