You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I'm not quite sure what exactly is the target?
Nevertheless, this unnatural "consistency" of error is also alarming.
This is an unnatural ideal: the ratio of the s.c.o. of an error to its m.o. is too low.
The residual from the model should have a variance equal to a constant, if possible.
If this is indeed the declared purpose, then you should reconsider the very basics. But it seems to me that you are confused again -- this time in your understanding of the purpose of modelling.
Don't think I'm trying to get at you here. No! What I'm suggesting here is that you should reconsider all your actions from the very beginning, starting from defining the problem and setting goals.
If this is indeed the declared purpose, then you should reconsider the very basics. But it seems to me that you are confused again -- this time in your understanding of the purpose of modelling.
Don't think I'm trying to get at you here. No! I suggest you to reconsider all your actions from the very beginning, starting from problem definition and goal setting.
this time already in understanding the purpose of modelling.
Trying to. Posted, but the idea went unheeded. The goal is the predictability of the model.
Formulate another one. This is not my goal and it is clear - if the variance of the residual is constant, then there is no uncertainty in the prediction error.
hmm... Actually, the goal is usually to minimize the error, not some constant at all. Moreover, in this formulation of the problem, the presence of a "dead" constant would indicate inefficiency of the minimization algorithm or an error in the algorithm itself.