You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What strategy imposition are you talking about?
This thread is simply for trading signals. To "explain" the signal with some indictors is purely voluntary.
What kind of strategy imposition are you talking about?
This thread is simply for trading signals. "Explaining" the signal with some indictors is purely voluntary.
I'm quoting the topicstarter:
Where's the explanation here? No stop loss - whatever. The presence of a stop is only a recommendation, not a prerequisite.
But if there is a paper drawdown, it still has to be stated explicitly. Even if the position will be closed with a profit.
It is not necessary to explain why you entered the position this way or that way, and why the order parameters are so. Everything will be decided after the position is closed.
What does SL have to do with the concept of "signal" anyway?) This is an order parameter ))))
And here I think there's a misunderstanding. Do you think that both stop orders are not signal parameters? Well, have a look at any decent site that publishes signals.
Exactly, why should I explain that SL is not necessary or necessary? ))) What does SL have to do with the concept of signal at all?))) This is an order parameter )))) ))) Maybe we should also talk about the lot size? )))
And you don't need to explain anything - especially if you don't understand why you should specify SL, then don't. Those who understand will draw their own conclusions ;).
ZS The highlighted one is a pleasure...
Exactly, why should I have to explain that SL is not necessary or necessary? ))) What does SL have to do with the concept of signal at all? ))) It's an order parameter )))) ))) Maybe we should also talk about the lot size? )))
Although, someone "above" said about the flooding, but...I'll flood a little...muzzle-rappers can delete it later.
1.What's the purpose of this thread? For example, the whole site helps beginners to learn how to program, and that, of course, is good, though it's clear that in the end the "programmer" has to learn Forex...hm-m-m-m-m-m-m... but here - "granny said two words".
2.Programmers often .... say that a "bad customer" doesn't want to pay much ... they say that programmers work hard and thankless, considering that the idea leads to a loss. So, what's the interest of the author, who publishes the signals of his system, from this altruism?
3 And what if my system gives signals that I myself do not know when it "wants" something? Then, these signals may pile up one after another, and may even disappear for an indefinite time ... all depends on the nature of the market.
4. In general, I like the idea of a starter-aper, but it needs to be thought through somehow.
1.What is the purpose of this thread?
2.Programmers often .... say that a bad customer doesn't want to pay much... the programmer's work is hard and thankless, considering that the idea leads to leakage. So, what interest does the author, who publishes his system's signals, have in this altruism?
3 And what if my system gives signals that I myself do not know when it "wants" something? Then, these signals may come one after another, and may even disappear for an indefinite time ... it all depends on the market.
1. the topicstarter clearly stated the goal in the first post of the thread. What is unclear?
2. this altruism is limited. Naturally, it is a desire to attract people - perhaps even future recipients of paid signals. But at this stage it is not selling, but pure altruism.
3. Refine the system. When you know "when it wants something", then put it out there.
Using a stop cannot even be a recommendation, because firstly, the presence of a stop does not reduce the risk or the level of potential losses, and secondly, in some cases it cannot be implemented in principle (for example, an Expert Advisor of the moving average type).
For a more adequate and, most importantly, real estimation of the robustness of signals, I propose to use the value of equity, fixed at a certain point in time, on a daily basis. This simple way of calculation will take into account everything.