The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 511
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And if we make it a little more complicated and say that out of 600 trades 300 will be on the plus side. Assuming the stop is equal to the take.
Can you make a profit? And how?
You won't be able to, because the spread and commission will lead your account to the red, and you may as well just open one and the same order type forever. At the end of the day, ZBZ will just be zero, but in the real market the losses are due to spread and commissions. So, you'll have to take the take profit twice or three times less than the stop, thus the probability of taking the profit will increase by 66,(6)% - 75% and for the stop loss it will decrease to 33,(3)% - 25%.
The disadvantages: equity will constantly "go in the red" now and then in the plus and, thus, the desired monthly profitability level of the system in its "pure form" does not work out.
However, trading only one order type, always omitting as far as possible disadvantageous moments, has much more chances to succeed than trading with two order types and it is more interesting that the chances of SELL trading are even higher as the price always falls more "willingly" than rises.
You can check it out.
The interesting thing is that there is an even better chance of SELL, because the price always falls more "willingly" than rises.
And when it falls, if sell EURUSD is buy USDEUR?)
Well, if you can find such a tool, yes).
But you're right, I meant EURUSD.
As for currency pairs, the money supply turnover of the quoted currency should be higher, then SELL is more profitable. If more than the base, then BUY.
You won't get it, the spread and commissions will take your account into minus, but you can do it by opening an order of the same type forever. At the end of the day, we will reach zero for ZBF, but in the real market we will lose due to spread and commissions. This means we will have to take the take profit twice or three times less than the stop, thus the probability of take profit will increase by 66,(6)% - 75% and stop loss will decrease to 33,(3)% - 25% respectively.
The disadvantages: equity will constantly "go in the red" now and then in the plus and, thus, the desired monthly profitability level of the system in its "pure form" does not work out.
However, trading only one order type, always omitting as far as possible disadvantageous moments, has much more chances to succeed than trading with two order types and it is more interesting that the chances of SELL trading are even higher as the price always falls more "willingly" than rises.
You can check it out.
I have roughly the same number of profitable and losing trades in bays and sels. Out of 600 trades 300 are profitable and out of them 150 are sells and 150 are bays.
The cult religious frenzy around Random is not subsiding 😆 and meanwhile in some parts of the internet there are signs of Random's cult existence, which is already reflected in memes (new age murals) and there are even some cult images of the god Random and its own syncretic philosophy described in wiki pages, including the postulation that Random is above all other gods 😀
TA SL?
TP=SL
The cult religious frenzy around Random is not subsiding 😆 and meanwhile in some parts of the internet there are signs of the existence of a cult of Random, which is already reflected in memes (new age murals) and there are even some cult images of the god Random and its own syncretic philosophy described in wiki pages, including the postulation that Random is above all other gods 😀
It cannot be otherwise, for the gods themselves were created out of what could have been before there was nothing.
In other words, the gods themselves are the offspring of a meaningless, but no less beautiful, random outburst of corpuscular-wave protobulion, i.e., the great Random.
Random is binary, its own mother and father, appeared thanks to the principle of quantum indeterminacy. And in general, all things (spelled with one s) may as well not exist as they do exist.
of the great Random.
Hail to the Great Random!
Hail to the Great Random!
Amen.