You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Can I give you as much as you want? Write globally: Magic = 0; Megic = 123; Migic = 345; Mogic = 567; Mugic = 789;
This is an example, and you can write as many mogic for each group as you want. And you check it in cycles! It works fine! If this is a "perversion", sorry!
No matter how you look at it, MetaEditor is the bottle-neck of MQL.
If you add just 4 possibilities from this picture, it's already a big step forward for MetaEditor. And there will be no "how to enable MQL in Visual Studio, Notepad++, etc." threads.
And how can we find an open order and determine which EA and which group of orders of this EA it belongs to? Without this, your gift is somehow incomplete. )
Check in the loop! And in function calls you pass the appropriate magic, and in the functions themselves you only represent that the neutral magic:
int magi = OrderMagicNumber();
That's all!
Check in a loop!
Thank you, it's a feast!
And how, when you find an open order, can you determine which EA and which group of orders of this EA it belongs to? Without that your gift is somewhat incomplete. )
The advice was, of course, delusional. And the second or third majors are unnecessary. Make a class where all dependencies and grid memberships are prescribed. And as a unique key just make a majik.
You have one RF civil passport, don't you? Nevertheless, with its number you are linked to a bunch of services. It's a rough analogy, of course.
I would also like to be able to interrupt the optimization of the robot and save the intermediate results, so that the next day the optimization can be continued from the interrupted location instead of from scratch.
I would also like to be able to interrupt the optimization of the robot and save the intermediate results, so that the next day you can continue optimization from the interrupted location rather than from scratch.
I would also like to be able to interrupt optimization of the robot and save intermediate results, so that the next day you can continue optimization not from scratch, but from the interrupted place.
This is how it has worked for a long time.
If the test conditions have not changed, the old results will pick up and the test will continue. Try it yourself.