You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Are you sure that nothing from the kotobase and the articles apply to the marketplace?
I'm not sure.
It's all "on honour, on conscience..." thinking. It is just a question of making sure that the licences are clear.
The current reality is that some firms have their income solely from litigation. And not only firms, but also individuals are not squeamish to run through the courts to get another thousand dollars.
Look at an elementary example - car lawyers and "long-liquidators". Their activities are based on imperfect contractual agreements between the parties. And as long as we are talking about penny orders in vreelancers and marketplace plumers, then nothing bad will happen to anyone. But it may well happen that someone will think to sue MQ, and they can already be charged not a penny, and that's where the one who was lucky enough to download the code from the database "will be caught", since according to the agreement, the MQL5 website user is responsible in such cases....
I haven't thought about it and don't care. The divide between resourcefulness and gadiness is something many people don't feel.
"It's never too early to think about it, and it's never too late" (c).
And your first impression is wrong - I give the customer the source code, not the finished compiled product.
I don't think they will go through the files. But they should sell their own so they don't have to worry, save money and, most importantly, health!
Why give the customer the source code
because he bought it, along with all the rights to it that can be transferred.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License ?
Whether or not this is the case, the meta-quotes should clarify.
The GPL gives recipientsof computer software thefollowing rights, or "freedoms"[6]:
In general, the distributor of a GPL-covered program or a program based on the GPL must make it possible for the recipient to obtain the corresponding source code.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License ?
Whether or not this is the case should be clarified by the methaqvos
a good option for the base licence, in which case no one can (legally) trade products in the market based on these codes.
because he bought them, along with all the rights to them that can be transferred.