Errors, bugs, questions - page 3095
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There is a script
Question: if GetPointer(obj) is passed ok, why &obj fails?
Is this needed for something?
I want to clarify, just in case. Suppose there is a code like this:
Is it possible in principle that x equals y?I want to clarify, just in case. Suppose there is such a code:
Is it possible in principle that x equals y?Theoretically, yes. Previously, the pointer unsetting showed a counter (you could see the number of all objects). Now it's random.
Theoretically, yes. Previously, the pointer printout showed a counter (you could see the number of all objects). Now it's random.
There is a script
Question: if GetPointer (obj) is passed ok, why does &obj fail?
Is it needed for something?
There is no need for GetPointer () here.
There is no need for a GetPointer () here.
I want to clarify, just in case. Suppose there is such a code:
Is it possible in principle that x equals y?No, impossible.
I want to clarify, just in case. Suppose we have the following code:
Is it possible in principle that x will be equal to y?I recommend that you don't use an autoranging pointer to a reference and do it explicitly, as shown in the code below (highlighted in red):
I recommend that you don't autorate the pointer into a link and do it explicitly as shown in the code below (highlighted in red):
There's no question about the error, but it's backdated for some reason.