You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Ever since build 478 this bug has been reported by me as #177997. Nothing has been heard since then.
Are you sure it's the same bug?
You use a test template with arrow objects already applied and wonder why these arrows are displayed in the future.
I can't be sure of anything of course - just similar symptoms. All I know is that the ticket has now been closed for some reason, with a note saying that I added the arrows to the chart myself. This is a load of nonsense. Instead of fixing bugs, close tickets. Well, as you like. I do not see the point in such a service-desk.
How, then, do you check that the examiner's work is correct? From the logbook is cumbersome. How do you check?
Of course I can't be sure of anything - just similar symptoms. All I know is that the ticket has now been closed for some reason, with a note saying that I added the arrows to the chart myself. This is a load of nonsense. Instead of fixing bugs, close tickets. Well, as you like. I do not see the point in such a service-desk.
No matter how much I talk to you, you are always rude. It's unpleasant.
No matter how much I talk to you, you are always rude. I don't like it.
I'm sorry, but I also hate it when I try to help and get undeserved claims in return.
That's not true about all the time. Count how many tickets you've had without being rude. A few dozen. There just wasn't any counter-attacks in them.
Question: what about adding to the function
ChartIndicatorAdd()
parameter indicating indicator window location above/below chart and implement support of this feature in the terminal?
or via IndicatorSetInteger() for the indicator? In UI it would allow to make a fixed menu/toolbar at the top
SD #242342
Are you sure it's the same bug?
You use a test template with arrow objects already applied and wonder why these arrows are displayed in the future.
Is it a bug after all? What to do?
Fellow developers! Do you think the Bars feature works as intended? My position is the following:
I consider the fact that in case of error the function returns 0 as a bug because: for example, there are two bars in front of us, one opened at 1 o'clock and the other at 5 o'clock. Further I have requested information about the number of bars from 2 to 4 hours (with the Bars function).
In this case it is logical to expect a return of 0. However, we need to understand whether there really are no bars opened in the interval we are interested in or there was an error when performing this function, but we still have bars? As far as I know, GetLastError() will not help here either.
Fellow developers! Do you think the Bars feature works as intended? My position is the following:
I consider the fact that in case of error the function returns 0 as a bug because: for example, there are two bars in front of us, one opened at 1 o'clock and the other at 5 o'clock. Further I have requested information about the number of bars from 2 to 4 hours (with the Bars function).
In this case it is logical to expect a return of 0. However, we need to understand whether there really are no bars opened in the interval we are interested in or there was an error when performing this function, but we still have bars? As far as I know, GetLastError() will not help here either.