You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I can't agree on that one. In GENERAL you can rely on it... but in practice? Not so much. For example, the theory of wars being created to help out peoples kids may be true, but may also not be. I agree she might try and help, BUT no one can predict certain things. Such as who will win an election and what policies he/she might try to affect/inflict.
elections are done deal...so is policies...so you are not correct 2 times...plus...99.9% of what we get in the news is prearranged...my point is ...if we did not need to hear about that jerk loosing 200 millions we would not...they would kill the story even if some journalist discovered it...and we know that of late journalists don't do anything unless...
I can't agree on that one. In GENERAL you can rely on it... but in practice? Not so much. For example, the theory of wars being created to help out peoples kids may be true, but may also not be. I agree she might try and help, BUT no one can predict certain things. Such as who will win an election and what policies he/she might try to affect/inflict.
Come on :
How many "professional politician" families are there in the USA (where Congress and Senate is flooded by those). What about the Kennedy family? What about the Bush family? The last Bush ruined an oil drilling company, got bailed out (bought out) from that company by the bin Laden family and then he became a president of the USA?
Same things in Europe. Same things in Asia (check the "political families" in India and China)
Nothing is as predictable as politics.
And nothing is as predictable as what those "politicians" are doing and are going to do once they grab any kind of power
Three reasons why markets would love a President Hillary Clinton
Greg Valliere at Potomac Research says Hillary Clinton, "has to be considered the favorite to win the presidency."
And for the markets, Valliere thinks a Clinton presidency would be a positive.
"Our very early bottomline is that the markets could gladly live with her," Valliere wrote in a note Tuesday.
Valliere gives three main reasons why:
And what's more, Valliere adds that if the 2016 presidential race turns out to be Hillary Clinton versus Jeb Bush, markets will find either winner acceptable.